UPDATE: South Stormont council, deputy mayor at loggerheads over spending

Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.


LONG SAULT, Ontario - Tammy Hart and her colleagues around the township council table in South Stormont are at odds over spending plans for the 2014 budget.

At issue is the amount of money the township may spend with a new newspaper that has plans to operate later this year in the township.

Hart is suggesting money should not be spent on so-called "new media" while her colleagues around the council table are suggesting the municipality should try to get as much bang for its advertising buck as possible.

We have reproduced letters from both parties below.

**UPDATE: Hart has issued another letter, clarifying statements she made previously. It is reproduced below.**

Township council offers its reasons for advertising in new media

Dear editor:

Four members of Council have decided collectively to take this unprecedented step to inform our taxpayers on an issue that has discredited the integrity of four members of your elected council and township staff.

There has been a suggestion by the deputy mayor that in council’s deliberation for the 2014 budget, preference was given to support a newspaper attempting to establish itself in South Stormont.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

Therefore we wish to explain and clarify the misinformation being circulated by Deputy Mayor Tammy Hart.

In December 2013, a presentation was made to council to introduce a newspaper with a local flavour specifically for the residents of South Stormont. The newspaper requested the township consider advertising in this new publication on a monthly basis, much like the township does in another local newspaper. Council was in favour of the project in principal, however, a review of marketing initiatives would take place as part of 2014 budget deliberations.

The issue of increased advertising came before two budget meetings. Discussion ensued with members expressing concern questioning the need for more advertising however, as a growing community with an increasing need for communication with our residents through multiple media avenues, an increase was approved.

Two (2) proposals for newspaper advertising were presented at the January 21, 2014 budget meeting and a report was prepared by staff for council to consider. The discussion centred very much about the value and need for further promotion of South Stormont, programs, activities and opportunities. Council agreed to advertise in both new newspapers.

We are taken aback to think a member of council would mislead the residents of South Stormont in this fashion. This attempt to discredit the reputations of your elected officials and total breach of trust against fellow members of council is disgraceful.

We trust this open letter has provided the rationale employed by your township for the betterment of our communication in our community.

Mayor Bryan McGillis

Coun. Barry Brownlee

Coun. Cindy Woods

Coun. Richard Waldroff


Hart says she objects to spending taxpayer money on new media

Dear editor:

To all my constituents in South Stormont, I would like to offer my prospective on the situation in South Stormont regarding the $10,600 awarded to a new newspaper. During two budgets meetings where Mayor Bryan McGillis, councillors Cindy Woods, Richard Waldroff and Barry Brownlee all voted in favour of funding a newspaper at no time did the mayor or council members express to me that this was adverting dollars to be allocated for the newspaper.

It was verbally implied the amount was to help towards the start-up costs.  I have on several occasions, including the December 11 council meeting, express my concerns of using taxpayer funds towards this venture.

At this time I am still awaiting the official minutes of the two meetings from township administration. I stand by my original votes against funding this project and welcome a review of the minutes showing that council will not fund this project.

At no time did I go on record stating that I did not agree to a responsible amount of advertising dollars, I just object to providing taxpayer funds towards a new media.

Tammy A. Hart

Deputy Mayor of South Stormont

Hart clarifies previous statement

In regards to my statement this week, (to all my constituents in South Stormont), I wish to clarify a couple of issues.

Please know that I completely understood that council agreed to advertise in (new media) during the first budget meeting on Jan. 21, 2014.

My point has always been (and what I have been trying to express), is that at no time during the final draft budget on March 5, 2014 was it clearly understood by me that the expenditure of $10,600 was solely for advertising.  There are no signed agreements of any kind, no information in front of me describing an ad of any sort for advertising in this newspaper.  Had the mayor and council members disclosed this point at that time, I would have suggested that we vote to support funding for the newspaper after we can establish its existence.  Unfortunately now this issue has snowballed and taken on a life of its own. This is just another example of why transparency is so important and needs to be adhered to by everyone.

I do hope that council will reconsider supporting the newspaper and vote to use taxpayer’s money for badly needed infrastructure instead.

I would like to add one last thing; I answer to the taxpayer not the Integrity Commission, the mayor or council.  The voting public will have the opportunity to judge my integrity in the October election; I look forward to it.

Once again, I am all in favour of supporting local business and anyone who is thinking about establishing a business in South Stormont I welcome it. 

Tammy A. Hart

Deputy Mayor of South Stormont

Organizations: South Stormont council

Geographic location: South Stormont, LONG SAULT, Ontario

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page



Recent comments

  • Ruth Currier
    March 19, 2014 - 15:39

    Dear Deputy Mayor, I want you to know how much I appreciate your dedication to this Township. You seem to be the only voice of reason and the only one who feels a sense of responsibility when deciding how best to spend tax payer’s money. Good for you. I'd rather have my tax dollars spent on the roads and sidewalks, opposed to an advertisement placed in yet another newspaper. You have my full support and MY VOTE in October.

  • jaredd
    March 18, 2014 - 20:47

    If the Deputy Mayor does not remember that the funds was for advertising then why does the resolution of December 11, 2013 specifically state that the support was to be in advertising which the Deputy Mayor voted on.

  • Township Website
    March 18, 2014 - 19:23

    Money is be spent so stupid for advertising when they should have their own site built would cost them 1000 dollars for the fist year to have built and hosted second year would only have to pay for hosting and keeping it maintained ..Give a student a job to maintain it letting them make a little spending money they can do from home after school have the data emailed they take some time to input it ..I visited the spot were you go now to get any info on the township its a joke very unprofessional a student could do better and the crap that goes on there is sickening people being put down like Mrs Hart and others all over the place must really suck for people to visit that site and have to go through all the garbage to get the info they want ..Township if they had own website would save lots of money and site could be used for many other things no reason for people to go to a bloggers site to get info on what's going on and the would not need this other news site to boot ..Glade I don't live their and have to go to that poor looking place they host with now its a shame to see and a waste of money when they could have own sites and run it for peanuts

  • Ralph Cooper
    March 18, 2014 - 17:53

    The South Stormont News online site is being operated by the same principal as Cornwall Free News blog, Jamie Gilcig. Maybe that is why Deputy Mayor Hart is at loggerheads. No one did any due-diligence.